Unofficial DVD Profiler Rules Review Forum
« Small corrections »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jan 1, 2010, 3:29am




Unofficial DVD Profiler Rules Review Forum :: Rules Review :: Common Errors :: Small corrections
   [Search This Thread][Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: Small corrections (Read 185 times)
xyrano
Member
member is offline





Joined: Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 59
Location: Stockholm, Sweden|2
Karma: 3
 Small corrections
« Thread Started on Oct 2, 2006, 7:28am »

...to bullets 4 and 5.
  • Overwriting data with changed information of re-releases (case type, cover images e.g. Case Type, Cover Images, SRP, ...).
  • Overwriting data with cover information which are proven to be false (running time, Region Codes e.g. Running Time, Regions, ...) ->Read previous contribution notes -> Read the previous Contribution Notes.
« Last Edit: Oct 9, 2006, 11:32am by xyrano »Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
xyrano
Member
member is offline





Joined: Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 59
Location: Stockholm, Sweden|2
Karma: 3
 Re: Small corrections
« Reply #1 on Oct 9, 2006, 5:57am »

Do I really need to do a voting thread for this one?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ya_shin
Universal Moderator
member is offline

[avatar]

[yim]
[homepage]

Joined: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 781
Location: Taoyuan, Taiwan|13
Karma: 2
 Re: Small corrections
« Reply #2 on Oct 9, 2006, 9:50am »

Personally I like the change to uppercase for bullet 4. We had a discussion for this before, and the others felt we should follow common grammar rules, rather than indicating the filed names through use of capitals. There you go...

I am still wondering why you feel we should remove the "previous" from bullet 5.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Achim
xyrano
Member
member is offline





Joined: Aug 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 59
Location: Stockholm, Sweden|2
Karma: 3
 Re: Small corrections
« Reply #3 on Oct 9, 2006, 11:25am »


Quote:
Personally I like the change to uppercase for bullet 4. We had a discussion for this before, and the others felt we should follow common grammar rules, rather than indicating the filed names through use of capitals. There you go...

Okay, I see. I think they are references to sections in this document. A section heading has, as far as I have seen, always had each word capitalized. Hence the suggestion(s).


Quote:
I am still wondering why you feel we should remove the "previous" from bullet 5.

[image] Looks like Mr. Typo been into play here... I'll add it again!

I'll also mark my changes, so you can see what I did.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
   [Search This Thread][Send Topic To Friend] [Print]

Common Errors

These are some mistakes that are seen very regularly in contributions - pay special attention that you are not including these in your contributionssubmissions:

Google
Webdvdprulesreview.proboards.com
Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!